Hey Andy, I'm actually not sure where the 'original' field value is coming from there, so I don't have a much better option for you. My guess is you're doing exactly what you should be here.

The code looks a little funky (I actually wasn't aware array notation would work like that : ), so if you wanted you could always extract the field value to its own array and access whatever array properties you want from that variable - but that's just a readability difference, not a difference in approach.

Thanks for contributing to other questions!